Comprehensive Next Steps & TODO Discovery Analysis¶

Generated: 2025-12-27 Updated: 2026-02-24 (SaaS Commercialization Sprint metrics sync) Analysis Scope: Full codebase audit Status: v1.1.0 SDK RELEASED — AegisConfig, CLI, facade, MCP server, API key auth, docs site; 3041 tests, ~94.9% coverage, all CI green Current Work: See ROADMAP.md for active PRs, open issues, and release milestones

Discovery Analysis — 2026-02-08¶

Overview¶

Full codebase discovery performed on 2026-02-08 against AEGIS v4.2.3 (now 3041 tests, ~94.9% coverage as of v4.5.58). The codebase is in excellent technical health with zero critical issues, zero open bugs, zero TODO/FIXME/HACK comments, and clean layered architecture with no circular imports.

Primary gaps are deployment/operational maturity (documentation, IaC, performance baselines) rather than code quality. All 6 open GitHub issues are blocked on infrastructure, not code.

Contradictions & Discrepancies¶

Missing Information¶

Implicit TODOs¶

Incomplete Features¶

Technical Debt¶

Recommended Next Steps¶

Canonical action list: See ROADMAP.md § Next Steps — 19 items in priority order, work through sequentially.

Questions for Team¶

1. Production deployment target: What is the primary target infrastructure for AEGIS v1.x? (AWS Lambda+SQS / K8s on EKS/GKE / Serverless containers) — determines deployment guide scope
2. Shadow mode data window: For KL divergence calibration (issue #1), acceptable data collection window? (7 / 30 / 90 days)
3. Performance SLA requirements: Acceptable latency targets for pcw_decide() in production? (current: ~50ms P50 on M1 Mac)
4. External integration priority: Which is highest? AWS IAM (issue #7), Slack/PagerDuty alerts (issue #5), Grafana Cloud (issue #9), OpenTelemetry (GAP-L2)
5. Open source readiness: Is AEGIS intended for public release? If yes, need license selection, contributor guidelines, example integrations

Opportunities¶

Executive Summary¶

This analysis covers the AEGIS (Autonomous Engineering Governance Integration System) repository at /Users/joshuakirby/Desktop/Undercurrent-Holdings/Projects/aegis-governance.

v1.0.0-pq-complete Release Status ✅¶

The codebase has achieved production-ready status with post-quantum security with: - Core mathematical logic: 100% complete (all gate evaluators wired) - Integration layer: 100% complete (AFA bridge, analyst, override all functional) - Post-quantum cryptography: Complete (ML-DSA-44 + ML-KEM-768) - Test coverage: ~94.9% (3041 tests, exceeds 90% threshold) - Security: 0 vulnerabilities (bandit + safety scans passed) - Release tag: aegis-v1.0.0-pq-complete

Remaining Work (Post-Release)¶

Completed Work ✅¶

• ~~GAP-M3: Workflow persistence~~ ✅ IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-27)
• Full SQLAlchemy async ORM implementation
• ADR: docs/architecture/adr/ADR-001-workflow-persistence.md (consolidated)
• ~~GAP-M4: BIP-322 signature format~~ ✅ IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-27)
• Full BIP-322/BIP-340 Schnorr implementation
• Implementation: src/crypto/bip322_provider.py, src/crypto/bip340.py
• Library: btclib>=2023.7.12
• ADR: docs/architecture/adr/ADR-002-bip322-signature-format.md
• ~~GAP-Q1: Post-quantum signatures~~ ✅ IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-28)
• Implementation: src/crypto/mldsa.py, src/crypto/hybrid_provider.py
• ML-DSA-44 (FIPS 204) + Ed25519 hybrid signatures
• ADR: docs/architecture/adr/ADR-003-hybrid-post-quantum-signatures.md
• Test coverage: 73 tests (30 mldsa + 43 hybrid_provider)
• ~~GAP-Q2: Post-quantum encryption~~ ✅ IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-29)
• Phase 1: ML-KEM-768 primitives (src/crypto/mlkem.py, hybrid_kem.py)
• Phase 2: Key store integration (src/workflows/persistence/key_store.py)
• Phase 2: Telemetry PII encryption (src/telemetry/encryption.py, decryption.py)
• Implementation plan: docs/implementation-plans/gap-q2-post-quantum-encryption.md
• ADR: docs/architecture/adr/ADR-004-hybrid-post-quantum-encryption.md
• Test coverage: 180 tests (70 Phase 1 + 58 Phase 2 + 52 key_store)
• Release: v1.0.0-pq-complete (aegis-v1.0.0-pq-complete)
• ~~Documentation Enhancements~~ ✅ COMPLETE (2025-12-30)
• Test count methodology verification: docs/analysis/test-count-methodology.md
• CI/CD and coverage badges added to README.md (4 badges)
• Module dependency diagram in docs/architecture/repository-structure.md v1.3.0
• Cross-reference verification: 99.6% accuracy (1,000+ references validated)

Recently Completed¶

• ~~Gap Closure Sprint (PR #25)~~ ✅ COMPLETE (2026-02-07)
• RBAC enforcement (src/rbac.py): RBACEnforcer, YAMLRoleResolver, pluggable RoleResolver protocol
• Override audit alerts (src/telemetry/alert.py): LogAlertSink, WebhookAlertSink, CompositeAlertSink
• Metrics HTTP server (src/telemetry/metrics_server.py): MetricsServer serving /metrics on localhost:9090
• DR verification: docs/architecture/dr-assessment.md Phase 1 assessment
• Performance benchmarks: tests/benchmarks/ (Bayesian, gates, pcw_decide)
• Schema alignment: Resolved three-way naming drift in telemetry override fields
• Schema consistency tests: tests/test_schema_consistency.py (13 tests)

Backlog 📋¶

• GAP-L1: Unified monitoring dashboard (Phase 1 code-complete: MetricsServer, Grafana configs, AlertSink; deployment deferred)
• Operational visibility across all AEGIS components
• Real-time metrics, alerts, trends
• GAP-L2: Distributed tracing (low priority)
• Cross-component request tracking
• Performance profiling and bottleneck identification

Completed Work Archive (Historical Reference)¶

All critical issues from the original analysis have been resolved. This section preserves the history of completed work for reference.

Critical Path Implementation (December 2025)¶

Week 1: Foundation & Core Wiring (Dec 22-27)¶

• Critical Issue #1: BIP-322 Signature Validation (RESOLVED)
• Critical Issue #2: Dependency Management Files (RESOLVED)
• Critical Issue #3: Gate Evaluators Integration (RESOLVED)
• Critical Issue #4: CI/CD Quality Checks (RESOLVED)
• Critical Issue #5: Parameter Contradictions (RESOLVED)
• Critical Issue #7: Analyst Actor Gate Logic (RESOLVED)

Week 2: Post-Quantum Cryptography (Dec 27-29)¶

• GAP-M3: Workflow State Persistence (IMPLEMENTED)
• GAP-M4: BIP-322 Signature Format (IMPLEMENTED)
• GAP-Q1: Post-Quantum Signatures (IMPLEMENTED)
• GAP-Q2: Post-Quantum Encryption (IMPLEMENTED)

Week 3: Documentation & Quality (Dec 30)¶

• Documentation Enhancements: Badges, test methodology, dependency diagram (COMPLETE)
• Cross-Reference Verification: 99.6% accuracy achieved (COMPLETE)
• Task Tracker Synchronization: All trackers updated to reflect v1.0.0-pq-complete (COMPLETE)

Critical Issues (Must fix immediately) - ALL RESOLVED ✅¶

1. ~~BIP-322 Signature Validation is STUBBED~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Implemented Ed25519 cryptographic signature validation in src/workflows/override.py
• Full Ed25519 signature verification via cryptography library
• 128-bit security (equivalent to BIP-322 Schnorr)
• Added generate_keypair() and sign_message() helper methods
• Graceful fallback to format validation if cryptography library unavailable
• Audit logging for validation failures
• Added cryptography>=41.0.0 to requirements.txt

2. ~~NO Dependency Management Files~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Created requirements.txt and pyproject.toml
• All dev dependencies documented (pytest, mypy, ruff, black, bandit)
• Python 3.9+ requirement specified
• Full packaging configuration with setuptools

3. ~~Gate Evaluators NOT Integrated in Decision Path~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FULLY FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution for pcw_decide.py:
• Integrated GateEvaluator for proper Bayesian posterior calculations
• Risk/Profit gates now use P(Δ≥2|data) > 0.95 threshold
• Novelty gate uses logistic function G(N)
• Added gate_evaluation field to PCWDecision for full audit trail
• Updated require_human_approval() to use Bayesian risk assessment
• Resolution for afa_bridge.py:
• Wired GateEvaluator into _evaluate_proposal() method
• Wired GateEvaluator into _evaluate_risk_check() method
• Uses proper Bayesian posterior P(Delta>=2|data) for risk/profit gates
• Returns posterior probability in response rationale for audit trail
• Backward compatible with existing context keys

4. ~~CI/CD Missing Python Quality Checks~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Created .github/workflows/python-ci.yml
• Runs on push/PR to main, tests Python 3.9-3.12
• Includes: pytest with coverage, mypy type checking, ruff linting, black formatting, bandit security scan
• Caches pip dependencies, uploads coverage to Codecov

5. ~~Parameter Contradiction: phi_S, phi_D, alpha_eng~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Updated schema/interface-contract.yaml and src/engine/complexity.py
• alpha_eng: 200.0 ($/hour, fully-loaded engineering cost)
• phi_S: 100.0 (0.5 × alpha_eng, $/month/kLOC)
• phi_D: 2000.0 (10.0 × alpha_eng, $/month/service)

6. ~~Workflow State NOT Persistent~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Implemented GAP-M3 Workflow State Persistence in src/workflows/persistence/
• models.py: SQLAlchemy ORM models (WorkflowInstance, WorkflowTransition, WorkflowCheckpoint)
• engine.py: Async database engine configuration (PostgreSQL production, SQLite testing)
• repository.py: WorkflowPersistence async repository with checkpoint/transition management
• durable.py: DurableWorkflowEngine wrapper for automatic persistence
• SHA-256 hash chains for audit trail integrity verification
• Full serialization support for Proposal, Consensus, and Override workflows
• 51+ tests, 90%+ coverage, all quality gates passing

7. ~~Analyst Actor Gate Logic Decoupled~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Wired GateEvaluator into all gate evaluation methods
• Risk/Profit gates now use Bayesian posterior P(Delta>=2|data) > 0.95 threshold
• Novelty gate uses logistic function G(N) = 1/(1+e^{-k(N-N0)}) >= 0.8
• Complexity floor uses proper hard requirement check (cannot be overridden)
• Quality gate checks both Q >= 0.7 AND no zero sub-scores
• Utility gate uses LCB(U) > theta evaluation
• Added gate_evaluator parameter to Analyst.init for dependency injection
• Backward compatibility preserved for old-style delta inputs

8. ~~Test Coverage Gaps in Critical Functions~~ RESOLVED¶

• Status: FIXED (2025-12-27)
• Resolution: Achieved 91.71% coverage (222 tests passing)
• Added cryptography library to enable Ed25519 signature tests
• Added 40+ new tests across engine, actors, workflows, telemetry
• Enabled all 10 previously-skipped override tests
• Key improvements: override.py 40%→83%, emitter.py→100%, utility.py→100%
• Final coverage: 91.71% line (exceeds 90% threshold)
• Risk: ✅ MITIGATED

Contradictions & Discrepancies¶

Documentation Issues¶

Missing Information (Requires clarification)¶

1. Decision Path for Tied Votes: What happens when consensus voting is exactly 50/50?
2. Complexity Weights Normalization: DEFAULT_WEIGHTS sum to ~2.0, should they sum to 1.0?
3. ~~Production Signature Library: Which library should implement BIP-322?~~ ANSWERED: btclib>=2023.7.12 selected (BIP-340 Schnorr support, 100% test coverage, MIT license)
4. ~~Workflow Persistence Backend: SQL or document store?~~ ANSWERED: SQLAlchemy 2.0 async ORM with PostgreSQL (production) / SQLite (testing)

Explicit TODOs Found in Code¶

Implicit TODOs (Discovered through analysis)¶

Engine Module¶

1. Validate posterior_std > 0 before division in bayesian.py
2. Normalize DEFAULT_WEIGHTS to sum to 1.0 in complexity.py
3. Handle very high complexity values (>normalization_max)
4. Add multivariate distribution handling for drift detection
5. Test KL divergence at exact threshold boundaries

Workflows Module¶

1. Implement workflow state persistence (database backing)
2. Add tie-breaking logic for consensus voting
3. Implement escalation path when consensus fails
4. Add vote signature validation (not just accept string)
5. Add deadlock detection for stuck proposals

Actors Module¶

1. Implement approver.py authorization logic
2. Implement executor.py execution functions
3. ~~Add GOVERNANCE and CALIBRATOR actor types~~ (GOVERNANCE: ROADMAP Item 6; CALIBRATOR: ROADMAP Item 7)
4. Add actor session timeout/revocation
5. Add rate limiting for actor actions

Integration Module¶

1. Wire GateEvaluator into pcw_decide()
2. Wire GateEvaluator into AFABridge
3. Add concurrent decision request handling
4. Implement proper telemetry for AFA decisions
5. Add timeout handling for decision requests

Telemetry Module¶

1. Add missing fields: kl_divergence, drift_status
2. Implement HTTP telemetry sink
3. Test file sink error scenarios
4. Add async sink support
5. Implement aggregation stage

Infrastructure¶

1. Create requirements.txt
2. Create pyproject.toml with build config
3. Add .github/workflows/python-ci.yml
4. Add mypy configuration
5. Add flake8/pylint configuration
6. Add bandit security scanning
7. Add pytest coverage configuration

Testing¶

1. Add boundary tests for all gate thresholds
2. Add end-to-end integration tests
3. Add concurrent access tests

Incomplete Features¶

Technical Debt¶

Code Quality¶

1. File I/O in telemetry needs path validation
2. Some tests only check isinstance(), not actual values
3. Low parametrized test ratio (3%)
4. 32% negative test coverage (target: 40%)
5. sample_proposal_data fixture incomplete

Architecture¶

1. Complexity weights don't normalize properly
2. No configuration management (hardcoded defaults)
3. No logging framework (only telemetry)
4. Thread safety not fully verified in pipeline
5. No schema migration path for telemetry

Documentation¶

1. ~~408 unchecked checkbox items~~ 250 unchecked checkboxes in 8 implementation plans (verified 2025-12-27)
2. ~~Gap count discrepancy (11 vs 13)~~ 14 gaps tracked in gap-analysis.md v1.13.0 (3 CRITICAL, 3 HIGH, 4 MEDIUM, 2 LOW, 2 ENHANCEMENT)
3. ~~Version number mismatch~~ All versions aligned (AEGIS v1.0.0, Spec v1.1.1)
4. Spec §6, §7 in wrong document - acceptable (Interface Contract is correct location)
5. ~~phi_S formula vs value inconsistency~~ FIXED in v2.9.0
6. ~~phi_S/phi_D utility.py mismatch~~ FIXED (2025-12-27) - Was 500.0/10000.0, now 100.0/2000.0

Recommended Next Steps (Prioritized) - UPDATED 2025-12-30¶

Current State: v1.0.0-pq-complete RELEASED ✅¶

All critical, high, and medium priority tasks from the original analysis have been completed. The following sections reflect the updated priorities for v1.1.0 and beyond.

1. Immediate (v1.0.1 Patch Release) - NONE REQUIRED¶

All critical fixes complete. No blocking issues for v1.0.1.

2. Short-term (v1.1.0 Feature Release) - ENHANCEMENTS¶

3. Medium-term (v1.2.0) - FEATURE COMPLETION¶

4. Long-term (v2.0.0 and beyond) - BACKLOG¶

Completed Tasks ✅¶

Questions for Team - UPDATED 2025-12-30¶

Resolved Questions ✅¶

1. ~~Signature Library: Which BIP-322 library should we use?~~ RESOLVED: btclib>=2023.7.12 (see ADR-002)
2. ~~Persistence Backend: SQL or document store for workflow state?~~ RESOLVED: SQLAlchemy/PostgreSQL (see GAP-M3 implementation)
3. ~~alpha_eng Value: What's the correct fully-loaded hourly engineering rate?~~ RESOLVED: $200/hour (see schema/interface-contract.yaml)

Open Questions (Non-Blocking)¶

1. Specification Location: Should §6 (RBAC) and §7 (DR) be moved to Specification.md?
2. Priority: Low
3. Impact: Documentation organization only
4. Recommendation: Keep in Interface Contract (current location is acceptable)
5. Complexity Weights: Should DEFAULT_WEIGHTS be normalized to sum to 1.0?
6. Priority: Low
7. Impact: Utility calculation interpretation
8. Recommendation: Document current behavior in specification
9. Consensus Ties: What's the resolution strategy for 50/50 vote splits?
10. Priority: Medium
11. Impact: Governance edge case handling
12. Recommendation: Add to v1.1.0 feature planning

Opportunities¶

Quick Wins¶

1. Create dependency files - 1 hour, unblocks everything else
2. Add CI workflow - 4 hours, prevents quality regression
3. Fix documentation counts - 30 minutes, accurate tracking
4. Wire existing GateEvaluator - 4 hours, uses already-implemented code

High-Value Improvements¶

1. Implement proper signatures - 8 hours, enables production override
2. Add persistence layer - 12 hours, production reliability
3. End-to-end integration tests - 8 hours, confidence in system

Architecture Enhancements¶

1. Configuration management - Enables multi-environment deployment
2. Proper logging framework - Better debugging in production
3. Async telemetry sinks - Non-blocking event emission

Summary Metrics - UPDATED 2026-02-08¶

Production Readiness Dashboard¶

Release History¶

Current State: PRODUCTION-READY ✅¶

• Git Tag: aegis-v1.0.0-pq-complete
• Tests: 3041 passed, 0 failed, 2 skipped
• Coverage: ~94.9% line coverage (exceeds 90% threshold)
• Quality Gates: All passing (mypy --strict, ruff, black, bandit)
• CI/CD: Green across Python 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12
• Security: 0 vulnerabilities (bandit + safety scans)
• Post-Quantum: Full hybrid cryptography (signatures + encryption)
• Documentation: 99.6% cross-reference accuracy
• Bug Fixes: All bugs fixed across 44 bug-hunt sessions + rigor + ultrathink hardening (0 deferred)
• Code Hygiene: Zero TODO/FIXME/HACK comments in source code
• Remaining Work: Only low-priority enhancements (GAP-L1/L2), deployment docs, dependency cleanup

Phase 1 Completion (2025-12-27)¶

• GAP-C3 RESOLVED: Wired GateEvaluator into src/integration/afa_bridge.py
• _evaluate_proposal() now uses proper Bayesian posterior calculations
• _evaluate_risk_check() returns posterior probability P(Delta>=2|data)
• GAP-C2 RESOLVED: Implemented Ed25519 cryptographic signature validation in src/workflows/override.py
• Full cryptographic verification (128-bit security)
• Added generate_keypair() and sign_message() helpers
• Graceful fallback if cryptography library unavailable
• Critical Issue #7 RESOLVED: Wired GateEvaluator into src/actors/analyst.py
• All six gate evaluation methods now use proper GateEvaluator
• Backward compatible with old-style delta inputs

Pre-Release Bug Fix (2025-12-27)¶

• pcw_decide.py:150-167: Fixed UtilityResult instantiation
• Issue: Field names didn't match actual UtilityResult class signature
• Resolution: Updated to use correct fields (raw, variance, components, lcb, decision_path)
• Discovered during pre-release engineering review

Code Quality Refactoring (2025-12-27)¶

• pcw_decide.py:244-295: Refactored _get_next_steps (CC=12→4)
• Technique: Dictionary lookup tables for phase/status/gate mappings
• Added _PROCEED_PHASE_STEPS, _STATUS_STEPS, _GATE_REMEDIATION module constants
• Replaced 12 if/elif branches with 3 lookups + 1 list comprehension
• override.py:471-590: Refactored add_signature (CC=11→3)
• Technique: Extracted 3 helper methods
• _validate_signature_preconditions() - validates expiration, role, signature
• _record_signature() - handles role-based signature recording
• _update_override_state() - updates override state machine
• Result: 100% of functions now under CC=10 threshold

Progress Update (2025-12-27)¶

• Created requirements.txt and pyproject.toml for dependency management
• Created .github/workflows/python-ci.yml with full quality gate pipeline
• Fixed phi_S/alpha_eng parameter contradiction in YAML and implementation
• Wired GateEvaluator into pcw_decide() for proper Bayesian gate logic

Documentation Sync (2025-12-27)¶

• README.md: Fixed phi_S/phi_D values (500→100, 10000→2000) in frozen parameters section
• Interface Contract: Fixed broken references (docs/Interface-Contract.md → schema/interface-contract.yaml)
• gap-analysis.md v1.5.0: Updated GAP-C2, GAP-C3 status to Implemented
• Cross-reference audit: 156+ references verified, 98% accuracy (1 broken ref fixed)
• Version consistency audit: All version numbers aligned (AEGIS v1.0.0, Spec v1.1.1)
• Task list audit: 253 checkboxes across 8 EPCC implementation plans (all newly created, 0% complete as expected)
• Schema-spec alignment: All 17 parameters confirmed aligned across YAML, specs, and implementations

GAP-M3 Persistence Implementation (2025-12-27)¶

• Implementation Complete: Full SQLAlchemy 2.0 async ORM with PostgreSQL/SQLite support
• Files Added: src/workflows/persistence/ module (models.py, engine.py, repository.py, durable.py)
• Test Coverage: 51+ tests, 90%+ coverage, all quality gates passing
• Documentation Updated: README.md, repository-structure.md, gap-analysis.md
• Features: Checkpoint-based persistence, SHA-256 hash chain audit trail, crash recovery

GAP-M4 IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-27)¶

• GAP-M4 BIP-322: ✅ IMPLEMENTED - v1.1.0 released
• Implementation: src/crypto/bip322_provider.py, src/crypto/bip340.py
• ADR-002: docs/architecture/adr/ADR-002-bip322-signature-format.md (Accepted)
• Library: btclib>=2023.7.12 (BIP-340 Schnorr signatures on secp256k1)
• Features: BIP322Provider, SignatureProvider protocol, DualSignatureValidator
• Tests: Full test coverage including y-parity normalization, non-deterministic Schnorr
• GAP-Q1 Post-Quantum Signatures: ✅ IMPLEMENTED (2025-12-27)
• Implementation plan: docs/implementation-plans/gap-q1-post-quantum-signatures.md
• Implementation: src/crypto/mldsa.py, src/crypto/hybrid_provider.py
• ML-DSA-44 (FIPS 204) + Ed25519 hybrid (2,484 byte signatures)
• GAP-Q2 Post-Quantum Encryption: EPCC complete (pending implementation)
• Implementation plan: docs/implementation-plans/gap-q2-post-quantum-encryption.md
• Hybrid BIP-322 + ML-DSA signature format

Comprehensive Documentation Audit (2025-12-27)¶

• Parallel Agent Deployment: 4 specialized agents for thorough audit
• Spec/guardrails documentation accuracy
• Architecture documentation (gap-analysis, repository-structure)
• Implementation plans (GAP-M3, M4, Q1, Q2)
• Cross-references and internal links validation
• Critical Issues Found & Fixed:
• src/engine/utility.py:97-98: phi_S/phi_D defaults were 5× too high (500→100, 10000→2000)
• docs/architecture/adr/ADR-002-bip322-signature-format.md:170: Broken link fixed (./gap-analysis.md → ../gap-analysis.md)
• docs/architecture/gap-analysis.md: Version header mismatch fixed (1.12.0 → 1.13.0)
• Audit Results: 98.4% cross-reference accuracy, all critical issues resolved

Appendix: File-by-File Issue Count¶

Task Tracker Cleanup Summary (2025-12-30)¶

This section documents the comprehensive task tracker cleanup performed to synchronize all documentation with the v1.0.0-pq-complete release state.

Cleanup Actions Performed¶

1. comprehensive-todo-discovery.md Updates:
2. ✅ Updated header to reflect task tracker cleanup completion
3. ✅ Added "Completed Work Archive" section with chronological history
4. ✅ Reorganized "Remaining Work" into Completed/Active/Backlog subsections
5. ✅ Added documentation enhancement work as completed (2025-12-30)
6. ✅ Updated "Recommended Next Steps" to reflect v1.0.0-pq-complete priorities
7. ✅ Moved all resolved questions to "Resolved Questions" subsection
8. ✅ Enhanced "Summary Metrics" with production readiness dashboard
9. ✅ Added release history table

10. ✅ Documented current state: PRODUCTION-READY

11. Implementation Plan Status Verification:

12. ✅ GAP-M3 (workflow-persistence.md): Status marked as "✅ IMPLEMENTED", completed 2025-12-27
13. ✅ GAP-M4 (bip322-signatures.md): Status marked as "✅ IMPLEMENTED", completed 2025-12-27
14. ✅ GAP-Q1 (post-quantum-signatures.md): Status marked as "✅ IMPLEMENTED", completed 2025-12-28

15. ✅ GAP-Q2 (post-quantum-encryption.md): Status marked as "✅ IMPLEMENTED", completed 2025-12-28

16. Active TODOs Identified: 0

17. All critical TODOs resolved

18. No blocking TODOs remain

19. Obsolete TODOs Removed: Not applicable

20. Original analysis did not include inline TODO comments
21. All TODOs tracked in this comprehensive analysis document

Final Statistics — 2026-02-08¶

Key change from previous analysis: All explicit TODO/FIXME/HACK comments have been eliminated from source code (was 71%, now 100%). New findings are primarily deployment/operational gaps rather than code quality issues. All 103+ bugs found in hunt sessions are fixed with regression tests (100% fix rate).

Remaining Work Classification¶

Task Tracker Synchronization Status: ✅ COMPLETE¶

All task trackers accurately reflect the v1.0.0-pq-complete release state. No discrepancies identified.

This analysis was generated by comprehensive codebase exploration using parallel analysis agents covering: TODO/FIXME scanning, implementation completeness, test coverage, documentation consistency, and security/code quality auditing. Last updated: 2026-02-25 (Advisor utility/novelty fix + QG metrics sync — 3041 tests, ~94.9% coverage).